Josie Lau has changed jobs and is now working under OUE. Coincidentally or not, the Chief Executive is the husband of the lawyer who had been part of her committee in taking over AWARE for a short time.
There is a contradiction too. He noted her trauma experienced due to the AWARE saga, in conjunction with his mention of her merits as being criteria for her employment. It seems that pity is another reason for her employment with his organization. Why the sudden mention of the saga when it has been resolved?
In her email to the Straits Times, she avoided answering the question of whether DBS's unhappiness over her presidential post in AWARE caused this career move. Does it mean that she has a guilty conscience and that this is true after all? If it is untrue, she should have replied to it right?
No comments:
Post a Comment